xgboost/doc/tutorials/saving_model.rst
Jiaming Yuan ef19480eda
Add dart to JSON schema. (#5218)
* Add dart to JSON schema.

* Use spaces instead of tab.
2020-01-28 13:29:09 +08:00

209 lines
8.8 KiB
ReStructuredText

########################
Introduction to Model IO
########################
In XGBoost 1.0.0, we introduced experimental support of using `JSON
<https://www.json.org/json-en.html>`_ for saving/loading XGBoost models and related
hyper-parameters for training, aiming to replace the old binary internal format with an
open format that can be easily reused. The support for binary format will be continued in
the future until JSON format is no-longer experimental and has satisfying performance.
This tutorial aims to share some basic insights into the JSON serialisation method used in
XGBoost. Without explicitly mentioned, the following sections assume you are using the
experimental JSON format, which can be enabled by passing
``enable_experimental_json_serialization=True`` as training parameter, or provide the file
name with ``.json`` as file extension when saving/loading model:
``booster.save_model('model.json')``. More details below.
Before we get started, XGBoost is a gradient boosting library with focus on tree model,
which means inside XGBoost, there are 2 distinct parts: the model consisted of trees and
algorithms used to build it. If you come from Deep Learning community, then it should be
clear to you that there are differences between the neural network structures composed of
weights with fixed tensor operations, and the optimizers (like RMSprop) used to train
them.
So when one calls ``booster.save_model``, XGBoost saves the trees, some model parameters
like number of input columns in trained trees, and the objective function, which combined
to represent the concept of "model" in XGBoost. As for why are we saving the objective as
part of model, that's because objective controls transformation of global bias (called
``base_score`` in XGBoost). Users can share this model with others for prediction,
evaluation or continue the training with a different set of hyper-parameters etc.
However, this is not the end of story. There are cases where we need to save something
more than just the model itself. For example, in distrbuted training, XGBoost performs
checkpointing operation. Or for some reasons, your favorite distributed computing
framework decide to copy the model from one worker to another and continue the training in
there. In such cases, the serialisation output is required to contain enougth information
to continue previous training without user providing any parameters again. We consider
such scenario as memory snapshot (or memory based serialisation method) and distinguish it
with normal model IO operation. In Python, this can be invoked by pickling the
``Booster`` object. Other language bindings are still working in progress.
.. note::
The old binary format doesn't distinguish difference between model and raw memory
serialisation format, it's a mix of everything, which is part of the reason why we want
to replace it with a more robust serialisation method. JVM Package has its own memory
based serialisation methods.
To enable JSON format support for model IO (saving only the trees and objective), provide
a filename with ``.json`` as file extension:
.. code-block:: python
bst.save_model('model_file_name.json')
While for enabling JSON as memory based serialisation format, pass
``enable_experimental_json_serialization`` as a training parameter. In Python this can be
done by:
.. code-block:: python
bst = xgboost.train({'enable_experimental_json_serialization': True}, dtrain)
with open('filename', 'wb') as fd:
pickle.dump(bst, fd)
Notice the ``filename`` is for Python intrinsic function ``open``, not for XGBoost. Hence
parameter ``enable_experimental_json_serialization`` is required to enable JSON format.
As the name suggested, memory based serialisation captures many stuffs internal to
XGBoost, so it's only suitable to be used for checkpoints, which doesn't require stable
output format. That being said, loading pickled booster (memory snapshot) in a different
XGBoost version may lead to errors or undefined behaviors. But we promise the stable
output format of binary model and JSON model (once it's no-longer experimental) as they
are designed to be reusable. This scheme fits as Python itself doesn't guarantee pickled
bytecode can be used in different Python version.
***************************
Custom objective and metric
***************************
XGBoost accepts user provided objective and metric functions as an extension. These
functions are not saved in model file as they are language dependent feature. With
Python, user can pickle the model to include these functions in saved binary. One
drawback is, the output from pickle is not a stable serialization format and doesn't work
on different Python version or XGBoost version, not to mention different language
environment. Another way to workaround this limitation is to provide these functions
again after the model is loaded. If the customized function is useful, please consider
making a PR for implementing it inside XGBoost, this way we can have your functions
working with different language bindings.
********************************************************
Saving and Loading the internal parameters configuration
********************************************************
XGBoost's ``C API`` and ``Python API`` supports saving and loading the internal
configuration directly as a JSON string. In Python package:
.. code-block:: python
bst = xgboost.train(...)
config = bst.save_config()
print(config)
Will print out something similiar to (not actual output as it's too long for demonstration):
.. code-block:: json
{
"Learner": {
"generic_parameter": {
"enable_experimental_json_serialization": "0",
"gpu_id": "0",
"gpu_page_size": "0",
"n_jobs": "0",
"random_state": "0",
"seed": "0",
"seed_per_iteration": "0"
},
"gradient_booster": {
"gbtree_train_param": {
"num_parallel_tree": "1",
"predictor": "gpu_predictor",
"process_type": "default",
"tree_method": "gpu_hist",
"updater": "grow_gpu_hist",
"updater_seq": "grow_gpu_hist"
},
"name": "gbtree",
"updater": {
"grow_gpu_hist": {
"gpu_hist_train_param": {
"debug_synchronize": "0",
"gpu_batch_nrows": "0",
"single_precision_histogram": "0"
},
"train_param": {
"alpha": "0",
"cache_opt": "1",
"colsample_bylevel": "1",
"colsample_bynode": "1",
"colsample_bytree": "1",
"default_direction": "learn",
"enable_feature_grouping": "0",
"eta": "0.300000012",
"gamma": "0",
"grow_policy": "depthwise",
"interaction_constraints": "",
"lambda": "1",
"learning_rate": "0.300000012",
"max_bin": "256",
"max_conflict_rate": "0",
"max_delta_step": "0",
"max_depth": "6",
"max_leaves": "0",
"max_search_group": "100",
"refresh_leaf": "1",
"sketch_eps": "0.0299999993",
"sketch_ratio": "2",
"subsample": "1"
}
}
}
},
"learner_train_param": {
"booster": "gbtree",
"disable_default_eval_metric": "0",
"dsplit": "auto",
"objective": "reg:squarederror"
},
"metrics": [],
"objective": {
"name": "reg:squarederror",
"reg_loss_param": {
"scale_pos_weight": "1"
}
}
},
"version": [1, 0, 0]
}
You can load it back to the model generated by same version of XGBoost by:
.. code-block:: python
bst.load_config(config)
This way users can study the internal representation more closely.
************
Future Plans
************
Right now using the JSON format incurs longer serialisation time, we have been working on
optimizing the JSON implementation to close the gap between binary format and JSON format.
You can track the progress in `#5046 <https://github.com/dmlc/xgboost/pull/5046>`_.
***********
JSON Schema
***********
Another important feature of JSON format is a documented `Schema
<https://json-schema.org/>`_, based on which one can easily reuse the output model from
XGBoost. Here is the initial draft of JSON schema for the output model (not
serialization, which will not be stable as noted above). It's subject to change due to
the beta status. For an example of parsing XGBoost tree model, see ``/demo/json-model``.
Please notice the "weight_drop" field used in "dart" booster. XGBoost does not scale tree
leaf directly, instead it saves the weights as a separated array.
.. include:: ../model.schema
:code: json